🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “complete double standards” for campaigning against tobacco control measures in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

A letter obtained by media originating from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the country’s government ministers asks for plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be scrapped or postponed.

The tobacco firm seeks amendments to a proposed legislation that include decreasing the suggested dimensions of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavored smoking items, and reduced sanctions for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Activist commentary

“Were I in government, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” commented the health advocate.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to WHO calculations.

Chimbala said the letter was understood to have been copied to multiple official agencies and was in circulating through community advocacy networks.

International corporate influence worries

The situation emerges alongside wider concerns about business sector influence with public health regulations. Recently, WHO officials sounded an alarm that the cigarette manufacturers was escalating campaigns to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“Evidence exists of corporate influence worldwide. Manufacturer hallmarks are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN high-level meeting,” stated the tobacco industry watchdog.

Potential consequences

“When public health regulation fails to be approved because of this letter, the cost might be borne in human lives who might potentially stop smoking.”

The public health measure progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and requiring that visual health alerts cover 75% of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Through correspondence, the company recommends this be lowered to 30% or 50% “following international recommended threshold”, postponed for minimum 12 months after the law is enacted.

Global health authorities actually suggests a alert needs to encompass at least half of the cigarette package face “and seek to occupy as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. In the UK, warnings need to encompass nearly two-thirds of a product container sides.

Flavored tobacco discussion

BAT asks for the withdrawal of extensive controls on scented smoking items, claiming that it would drive users to “illicitly sold” products. The corporation recommends banning a limited selection of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The draft bill proposes sanctions for multiple violations “ranging from a percentage of annual turnover to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Company justification

In the letter, the corporate leader of the African subsidiary says the company is dedicated to good corporate behaviour” and “endorses the aims of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the related medical consequences” but claims that “specific rules can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued the corporation's recommended amendments would “dilute these regulations so much that the required influence for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that many such provisions existed in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “complete contradiction”, he stated.

“We exist in a international community. If I plant tobacco in my property and harvest that and sell it out – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to profit individually and all the subsequent offspring while my community's youth are dying … is in itself complete moral bankruptcy.”

Tobacco control legislation in the Britain or other nations had failed to shutter businesses, the campaigner stated. “Regulations don't close the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative commented: “The corporation runs its business in compliance with current country statutes. Further, the corporation engages in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which allow for interested party involvement in policymaking.”

The firm positioned itself as “not resisting legislation”, the spokesperson stated, noting that young individuals should be safeguarded against obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We champion evolving legislation to achieve intended community wellbeing objectives, while acknowledging the spectrum of rights and obligations on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the representative explained, mentioning that the company's suggestions “mirror the circumstances of the African nation's economy and cigarette sector, which involves rising levels of illegal commerce”.

Zambia’s department of trade, commerce and industry was contacted for response.